Judging Sex Work
Bedford and the Attenuation of Rights
- Publisher
- UBC Press
- Initial publish date
- Feb 2024
- Subjects
- Constitutional, Prostitution & Sex Trade, Legal History, General
Next / Previous structural navigation
Print-equivalent page numbering
Short alternative textual descriptions
Use of high contrast between text and background color
Publisher’s web page for detailed accessibility information:
https://www.ubcpress.ca/accessibility
Table of contents navigation
Index navigation
EPUB Accessibility Specification 1.0 AA
Compliance certification by:
https://bornaccessible.org/certification/gca-credential/
Use of color is not sole means of conveying information
No reading system accessibility options actively disabled (except)
Language tagging provided
Single logical reading order
Compliance web page for detailed accessibility information:
http://www.idpf.org/epub/a11y/accessibility-20170105.html#wcag-aa
-
eBook
- ISBN
- 9780774869799
- Publish Date
- Feb 2024
- List Price
- $32.99
Library Ordering Options
Description
In Bedford, the Supreme Court struck down prohibitions against communicating in public for the purpose of sex work, living on its avails, and working from a bawdy house. Its narrow constitutional reasoning nevertheless allowed Parliament to respond by adopting the “end demand” or “Nordic Model” of sex work regulation, an approach widely criticized for failing to ensure sex worker safety. Judging Sex Work takes stock of the Bedford decision, arguing that the constitutional issue was improperly framed. Because the most vulnerable sex workers have no realistic choice but to commit the impugned offences, they already possess a legal defence. The constitutionality of the sex work laws should therefore have been assessed by their application to those who choose sex work, an approach that militates in favour of upholding these laws based on current jurisprudence. While this approach leads to the former restrictions on sex work being constitutional, it also has the salutary effect of forcing litigants to consider a more pressing question: Can sex work be rationalized as a criminal matter at all?
About the author
Contributor Notes
Colton Fehr is an assistant professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Saskatchewan. He is the author of Constitutionalizing Criminal Law and has been published in numerous journals, including the Journal of International Criminal Justice, the National Journal of Constitutional Law, the Canadian Journal of Law & Technology, the Canadian Criminal Law Review, the Criminal Law Quarterly, the Journal of International Criminal Justice, the Osgoode Hall Law Journal, the McGill Law Journal, the Queen’s Law Journal, and the UBC Law Review.